|
|
Metropolis (1926)
|
Directed
by:
Fritz
Lang |
COUNTRY
Germany |
GENRE
Science-Fiction |
NORWEGIAN TITLE
Metropolis |
RUNNING
TIME
153
min (original)
116 min (1927 edit)
148 min (2010) |
|
Produced
by:
Erich
Pommer |
Written by
(based on her novel):
Thea von
Harbou |
Review
One of film history's earliest triumphs
in visual effects and production design, Metropolis still
looks and feels magnificent even after a century of ageing. Fritz
Lang deployed a record-breaking budget and avant-garde use of
miniatures and special effects, most notably the Schüfftan process,
in order to create the illusory, dreamlike sci-fi world of
Metropolis – a futuristic city in which the division between the
lowly workers and the sophisticated upper class has grown to
dangerous, tyrannical
proportions. We follow the young and idealistic Freder (Gustav
Frölich), son of the city's oppressive master, in his search for the
truth about his father's reign – and a more substantial meaning to
life than idling away at various sheltered past-times. The clash
between the privileged and the poor is inevitable in this epic. Still, Lang's
depiction of it, and of the film's dystopian society, remains
multifaceted, relevant and remarkably universal. The fact that Metropolis was so prophetic for what was to happen in Germany about
a decade later is more a confirmation of the timeless validity of
Lang and his screenwriter Thea von Harbou's story; a reminder that a
totalitarian rule is only ever a complacent society away.
Despite this, there is a sentimental optimism to Metropolis which
infuses the silent moments and makes it a remarkably satisfying
watch in addition to all the impressive extravaganza. One of the
most influential, monumental and aesthetically flawless pictures of
all time.
PS! The film exists in several
different cuts, one of which is from 2010 and includes a number of
segments from Fritz Lang's original cut which were found in a
damaged print in an Argentinian museum in 2008. These newly restored
segments are of such a poor technical quality that they work more as
a detraction than a completion, and therefore I recommend the 2001
cut instead.
|
|