data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5c44/a5c443fa0e91da8fe336008acf713ac9ba2c370a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33d15/33d15e3b3e7c8d5f5d5b7c76b18fd67d9fcb97c5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36c13/36c136ff7a9331ab9f6d227436ab9f182f7d34aa" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c27d/4c27db4fffe81913013a18c776648c530e06cbbf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fc92/9fc92f82fd14b340177365f6c14f65b07d03d872" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bced/2bcedb16abb3f6cdec6b71b6cc8008582998d95e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/782e8/782e8e149e0a0ccea170327ad1088ca13cebd3e0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ced2/3ced259987f55ae616b8bb848872d1a643b15d96" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7958c/7958ccb375b9bf58c673a42d3992446733f0aa04" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e44a5/e44a528391712e73e8b8985b81cebdcd11421495" alt="" |
Hannibal
(2001)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ef8/29ef8474da6921a5ea510abb8d6df5c1e4aa0279" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ef8/29ef8474da6921a5ea510abb8d6df5c1e4aa0279" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ef8/29ef8474da6921a5ea510abb8d6df5c1e4aa0279" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ef8/29ef8474da6921a5ea510abb8d6df5c1e4aa0279" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1a83/b1a83635e89b89595f889a5ce3fc2ca27504760c" alt=""
|
Director:
Ridley Scott |
COUNTRY
UK/USA |
GENRE
Thriller |
NORWEGIAN
TITLE
Hannibal |
RUNNING
TIME
131
minutes |
|
Producer:
Dino De Laurentiis
Martha De Laurentiis
Ridley Scott |
Screenwriter
(based on the novel by Thomas Harris):
David Mamet
Steve Zaillian |
Review
There
is something refreshing about sequels that appear with a time separation
as substantial as that of this follow-up to the incomparable The
Silence of the Lambs. That is not to say there isn't a
commercial interest in this project, but with a new director and a new
approach by both the screenwriters and the author alike, Hannibal
emerges as an autonomous work, more an elaboration on the persona and
life that is Hannibal Lecter's than a constrained continuation of
Demme's film.
Under
Ridley Scott's direction, Hannibal hasn't got the drive and
suspense of its predecessor, but makes up for that through its delicate
atmosphere and seductive nature. In Hannibal, Dr. Lecter's
creepiness is conveyed in a more sensual manner, bordering on the
erotic. It's a development which suits him and his surroundings.
Narratively the film is structured as two separate pursuits on Lecter on
two different continents by two highly interesting characters played
with vigour and conviction by Gary Oldman and Giancarlo Giannini
respectively. Both
subplots are brooding and sinister in atmosphere, but at the same time highly
interesting from both a social and an interpersonal point of view.
Balancing in between as a mediator we find our hero (in the traditional
sense), Clarice Starling. Although looking the part, Julianne Moore is
the film's weakest point. She isn't able to satisfactorily convey the
emotional connection Starling has to Lecter, and the ambivalence which
Foster so brilliantly portrayed is missing - especially towards the end
of the film in some of the most crucial and captivating scenes.
Luckily,
Anthony Hopkins is on hand to carry the weight, and to
perfection. He manages to build on the intimidating figure he created in
The Silence of the Lambs
and add new aspects to him here in Hannibal. His
character has become superhuman in a fascinating, devilish way. Still,
it is his not completely absent goodness which attracts us the most, and
his relationship to Starling is deep, yearning and affecting. There's a
vulnerability to Lecter here that brings him closer to us while at the
same time making his enigma even more interesting. And Scott has the
flair to make the description of him poetic and beautiful. That's a
quality which almost equals Gary Oldman's ability to make a disfigured,
spoiled pedophile appealing.
|
|