|
|
Little
Women (1994)
|
Directed
by:
Gillian
Armstrong |
COUNTRY
USA |
GENRE
Drama |
NORWEGIAN TITLE
Småfrøkener
Unge kvinner |
RUNNING
TIME
119 minutes |
|
Produced
by:
Denise Di Novi |
Written by
(based on the novel by Louisa May
Alcott):
Robin Swicord |
Review
This adaptation of Louisa May Alcott's
classic novel gives you a warm welcome with its exquisite production
design which transports you effectively back to the 1860s. Granted,
it's a peculiarly smug version of the 1860s, despite the March
family's ostensible financial hardships, but then again this is a
story from the
upper/middle class with its strong focus on mannerisms and
refinement. Our main protagonist, Jo March (Winona Ryder), is the
second of four sisters growing up in Concorde, Massachusetts with their mother Marmee (Susan
Sarandon). Jo is an early feminist; she doesn't want her life to
be about marrying well. Instead, she has ambitions as a writer
and rejects the advances from her charming next door
neighbour Laurie (Christian Bale). Little Women quickly draws
you into the sisters' tight-knit life, with their easily forgotten
quarrels and defining but never disruptive differences. As directed
by Aussie filmmaker Gillian Anderson (My Brilliant Career,
Mrs. Soffel), the picture has an appealing innocence to it. And the young and talented cast prosper under
Anderson's steady direction: Ryder gives one of the best
performances of her young career, Claire Danes is daringly effective
as the sickly Beth, and Christian Bale is brilliant as Laurie. He
gives the film the necessary bite and zest through his character's
small imperfections. Even the somewhat unorthodox casting of Gabriel
Byrne as Friedrich Baer pays dividends – his connection with Ryder
is strangely believable. Thomas Newman's uplifting score caps off
the film, and an inspired year for him (after fine contributions to
The Shawshank
Redemption and
The War). This adaptation of
Little Women has
got all the elements that great period drama escapism should have.
|
|