data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5c44/a5c443fa0e91da8fe336008acf713ac9ba2c370a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33d15/33d15e3b3e7c8d5f5d5b7c76b18fd67d9fcb97c5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36c13/36c136ff7a9331ab9f6d227436ab9f182f7d34aa" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c27d/4c27db4fffe81913013a18c776648c530e06cbbf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fc92/9fc92f82fd14b340177365f6c14f65b07d03d872" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bced/2bcedb16abb3f6cdec6b71b6cc8008582998d95e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/782e8/782e8e149e0a0ccea170327ad1088ca13cebd3e0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ced2/3ced259987f55ae616b8bb848872d1a643b15d96" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7958c/7958ccb375b9bf58c673a42d3992446733f0aa04" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e44a5/e44a528391712e73e8b8985b81cebdcd11421495" alt="" |
Zodiac
(2007)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ef8/29ef8474da6921a5ea510abb8d6df5c1e4aa0279" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ef8/29ef8474da6921a5ea510abb8d6df5c1e4aa0279" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ef8/29ef8474da6921a5ea510abb8d6df5c1e4aa0279" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ef8/29ef8474da6921a5ea510abb8d6df5c1e4aa0279" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1a83/b1a83635e89b89595f889a5ce3fc2ca27504760c" alt=""
|
Director:
David Fincher |
COUNTRY
USA |
GENRE
Drama/Thriller/Mystery |
NORWEGIAN TITLE
Zodiac |
RUNNING
TIME
158 minutes |
|
Producer:
Ceán Chaffin
Brad Fischer
Mike Medavoy
Arnold Messer
James Vanderbilt |
Screenwriter
(based on books by Robert Graysmith):
James
Vanderbilt |
Review
David
Fincher's intricate sense of presenting the unknown in enchanting
fashion once again comes to prominence in this meticulous, rich and
extremely comprehensive study of the Zodiac killer and the society he
came from and subsequently left in his wake. The film has an amazing
relevance as a social comment and in viewing the events in light of the
time period(s) in question. Fincher skilfully and almost blatantly
gives one of the most insightful comments on the development of the
information age, and on the strengths and weaknesses of 1970s practices
as opposed to current practices in both law enforcement in general,
investigations in particular, as well as the different media desks and –
perhaps most stunningly – the way the public reacts to potential dangers.
Zodiac is executed with style and skill, and directed with flair
and virtuosity.
We
are taken to California anno 1969, centered in San Francisco and a few
closely scattered small-towns. It is the dawn of the serial killings
that were to become known as the works of the Zodiac Killer – a figure that
through his high-profile public "appearances" made him
infamous and notorious beyond his actual misdeeds. In Zodiac, we
delve into just about every aspect of the investigation and the circumstances
surrounding the Zodiac – all from a very factual point of view. Fincher
rarely gets himself tangled in speculative theories beyond those which
are generally accepted as very probable by most experts on the case.
This gives the film an objectivity that it desperately needs taking the
excessive running time and the talky nature into account, but it also
allows the viewer to ponder the different options and theories by
himself – because, reflecting the real situation in the case, very few
definite conclusion are being made. Some might argue that this is what
makes a film like this inconclusive and unsatisfactory, but in my
opinion it makes it more real, less artificial, and more rewarding from
an intellectual and academic point of view. Fincher presents a level of
realism combined with a level of haunting imagery and contemporary
detail that takes us right into the very core of the time and situations
in question. There's nothing here that is merely scratched on the
surface and then rushed away from.
Zodiac
works on many levels, which is what justifies its excessive antics: (1)
It has its share of suspenseful, brilliantly directed thriller scenes,
some of which resembles something Jonathan Demme could have conducted.
(2) It gives an intricate look into obsolete techniques and practices in
both police work and the press. (3) It is a remarkable evocation of life
in 60s and 70s California. And (4) it provides a probing study of a
handful of very diverse characters. The final point is helped by a large
(but, remarkably, quite unconfusing) cast and their brilliant acting.
Gyllenhaal and Ruffalo give among their best work ever, challenging
their own characters as they go along, producing remarkable
developments in them, whereas Robert Downey Jr. justifies that he was
once considered one of Hollywood's brightest talents. All problems
aside, here he is back to the sort of work he gave in Chaplin
fifteen years ago. Together with fine supportive work by, in particular,
Anthony Edwards, Brian Cox, John Carroll Lynch, Chloë Sevigny, Elias
Koteas, Philip Baker Hall, and a hilarious Patrick Scott Lewis, they
give the film a spontaneity and a spirited nature that makes this arguably
Fincher's best work from a dramatic point of view.
|
|